home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
1095.doc
/
000918_owner-lightwav…mail.webcom.com_Mon Oct 16 14:54:23 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-11-07
|
2KB
Received: by mail.webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA118370462; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 14:54:23 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com>
Received: from gw.provo.novell.com by mail.webcom.com with SMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA118270443; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 14:54:03 -0700
Received: from novell.com by gw.provo.novell.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA29319; Mon, 16 Oct 95 15:48:20 MDT
Received: from PRV-INTERNET-Message_Server by novell.com
with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 16 Oct 1995 15:48:19 -0600
Message-Id: <s0827ec3.082@novell.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 4.1
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 15:52:50 -0600
From: Mathew Mower <MMOWER@novell.com>
To: lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Subject: Morphing magic - NOT!?!?
Sender: owner-lightwave@mail.webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
Sorry if this is a dumb question, but . . . .
Why is it that LW requires exact point correspondence for object
morphs?
I'm sure that I have seen other programs that allow arbitrary object
morphs (at least I did see cubes to spheres). Is this a limitation
for all packages or just LW.
It seems to me (JMO) that it would be nice if LW would allow you to
select two objects and define a morph defined by parameters like
vertical axis, etc. I can see that there would be some possibilities
that would be complex but in a similar way that ER does a 2D morph,
shouldn't you be able to define that general areas will shrink to
become XXX.
MM
--
Mathew Mower <MMOWER@novell.com> sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com